Chambers – Private workplaces for barristers and judges - Leo Cussen

Skip to main content Skip to main navigation

Chambers – Private workplaces for barristers and judges

Ever wondered why barristers work in chambers while solicitors work in offices? Understanding these differences provides insight into the legal profession, its history and how different legal careers operate today.

Articles

Legal Careers

5 min read

What are chambers?

Unlike solicitors, who generally work in law firms, barristers work in chambers. Chambers are private workplaces where independent barristers practise, often sharing administrative facilities while operating their own individual practices. The term dates back centuries and comes from the Old French chambre, derived from the Latin camera, meaning a private room.

Why do barristers work in chambers?

Barristers are specialist advocates who appear in court and provide expert legal advice. Most are self-employed and work independently, practising from chambers that are often located close to the courts. Sharing chambers allows barristers to remain independent while benefiting from shared facilities and professional support.

How is this different from a solicitor’s office?

Solicitors typically work within law firms or legal organisations, managing client relationships, legal transactions and ongoing legal matters. While solicitors and barristers often work together, their workplaces reflect the different roles they perform within the legal system.

What are a judge’s chambers?

Judges also have chambers, but these are private rooms located within the court building. While most hearings take place in open court, some matters may be heard privately in camera. Despite the name, in camera simply means “in private” and has nothing to do with photography.

Why is open justice important?

Australian courts operate on the principle of open justice, meaning legal proceedings are generally conducted in public to promote transparency and accountability. Although in camera hearings are sometimes necessary, they remain the exception, reflecting the legal profession’s long-standing commitment to fairness and public confidence in the justice system.